On 22/06/07 at 13:07 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: > On Fri, 22 Jun 2007, DDPOMail robot wrote: > > > Dear GNU Hurd Maintainers, > > > > The following possible problem(s) were detected in the package(s) > > you maintain in Debian: > > > > gnumach: > > This package has not been in testing for more than 751 days. > > This package has not been able to migrate from unstable > > to testing for more than 751 days. > > > > hurd: > > This package has not been in testing for more than 751 days. > > This package has not been able to migrate from unstable > > to testing for more than 751 days. > > > > mig: > > This package has not been in testing for more than 751 days. > > This package has not been able to migrate from unstable > > to testing for more than 751 days. > > > > This is an semi-automated mail. These mails will be sent monthly. > > For more information about these mails, refer to > > http://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/DdpoByMail > > > > We are sorry if this mail was useless for you. If you think it was > > avoidable (that we can detect easily that the problems weren't > > actually problems), please reply to it and let us know. > > It could be avoided, yes. > > The "hurd" package does only exist for the hurd-i386 architecture, > and such architecture does not have a testing distribution. > > Seems like a bug in the script used to generate the reports, for not > taking this in account.
Hi, It seemed easier to just ignore those 3 packages, so I just did that. When kfreebsd-i386 joins in, and if it's not a testing arch as well, I'll try to hack something to take that into account. Thank you for the feedback. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
