Hello,
Ok, making the zalloc area bigger needs more virtual memory, the
attached patch should fix it.
Samuel
Index: b/i386/i386at/model_dep.c
===================================================================
--- a/i386/i386at/model_dep.c 10 Nov 2008 15:18:47 -0000 1.9.2.19
+++ b/i386/i386at/model_dep.c 11 Jun 2009 00:32:30 -0000
@@ -231,10 +232,10 @@ mem_size_init(void)
printf("AT386 boot: physical memory from 0x%x to 0x%x\n",
phys_first_addr, phys_last_addr);
- /* Reserve 1/16 of the memory address space for virtual mappings.
+ /* Reserve 1/8 of the memory address space for virtual mappings.
* Yes, this loses memory. Blame i386. */
- if (phys_last_addr > (VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS / 16) * 15)
- phys_last_addr = (VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS / 16) * 15;
+ if (phys_last_addr > (VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS / 8) * 7)
+ phys_last_addr = (VM_MAX_KERNEL_ADDRESS / 8) * 7;
phys_first_addr = round_page(phys_first_addr);
phys_last_addr = trunc_page(phys_last_addr);
