On 17.12.09 Samuel Thibault ([email protected]) wrote: > Hilmar Preusse, le Thu 17 Dec 2009 11:03:09 +0100, a écrit :
Hi Samuel, > > detex.l:92: error: 'NOFILE' undeclared here (not in a function) > > > > i.e. this line in the header > > > > FILE *rgfp[NOFILE+1]; /* stack of input/include files */ > > > > Can you help us here? > > Just quoting glibc's NOFILE comment: > > /* The following are not really correct but it is a value we used for a > long time and which seems to be usable. People should not use NOFILE > and NCARGS anyway. */ > #define NOFILE 256 > #define NCARGS 131072 > > http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd/porting/guidelines.html tells to > dynamically request it through > > getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE,...) > > Which returns 1024,1024 on Linux (and 1024,2^31-1 on GNU/Hurd). > I'm sorry, I'm not a programmer. How should the correct code look in your opinion: #ifdef GNU FILE *rgfp[getrlimit(RLIMIT_NOFILE,...)+1]; #else FILE *rgfp[NOFILE+1]; #endif Or should I replace the getrlimit by 1024? Many thanks, Hilmar -- Close cover before striking. http://www.hilmar-preusse.de.vu/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
