On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 23:37 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > On 08/06/10 23:28, Iain R. Learmonth wrote: > > On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 21:58 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > >>> +// there can be certain circumstances where PIPE_BUF is not > >>> +// defined in <limits.h>. If so, just define the minimum > >>> +// required by POSIX > >>> +#ifndef PIPE_BUF > >>> +#define PIPE_BUF 512 > >>> +#endif > >> > >> This looks more like a hack than a fix, though I'm not completely sure. > >> > > > > I agree, the problem here is with limits.h > > Not really. The point is that there's no such limits on Hurd (e.g. max > hostname > length, max pathname length...).
The limits may not physically exist, but for applications looking for them, wouldn't it be good to have that compatibility built in? > > You may want to CC the list :) Ooops. Regards, Iain -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
