On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 06:41:25AM +0100, [email protected] wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 04:56:36PM +0100, Michael Banck wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:10:25AM +0100, Svante Signell wrote: > > > On 2011-02-03, Joerg Jaspert <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > * get rid of hurd (or discuss this) > > > > > > Why? GNU/Hurd has made vast improvements during last year. Even the > > > Debian installer is functional. Now, with support for VMs like qemu, > > > xen and virtualbox, more people are showing interest in GNU/Hurd. > > > > Please let's not have that discussion on debian-devel without making a > > good case first and coordinating responses. > > I.e., never?
Hrm? > What's so bad about someone speaking up? They keep bringing this up. If > nobody reacts, it's a sure sign nobody cares, and they are free to drop > it. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if that's the whole point of > bringing it up at all... First off, claiming that we got loads of newly interested users/developers recently isn't a good approach, it was shot down by Marco immediately. Seconds, mailing -devel about it won't help that much, we need to talk to the ftp-masters as well. I think we should revisit their old list of requirements and see how we do, prepare a report on that and ask them what else we should do now. Michael -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
