Samuel Thibault, le Wed 30 Mar 2011 11:32:02 +0200, a écrit : > [email protected], le Tue 29 Mar 2011 23:38:27 +0200, a écrit : > > On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 06:52:36PM +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > > The archive coverage may be a concern: possibly getting from 68% to > > > 85% won't come by just fixing a few depended-on packages... > > > > I once did a rough estimation based on percantage of failing vs. > > build-dep packages and applying it recursively. I arrived at the > > conclusion that if it wasn't for the build-dep issues, we should be at > > about 85% packages building. > > Had you applied the % of failing packages to the build-dep packages? > (since they won't all succeed). In my memory it wasn't getting to it.
The current figures are: up-to-date: 66.4% need-build: 2.33% building: 0.14% failed: 14.5% dep: 15.1% So, even assuming that the 2.33% pending actually build, and rounding that to 70. We have about 15% failed and 15% dep-waiting. At best we can hope 85% indeed. But 15% packages have failed to build, which is 17.5% of all the attempted packages, and thus of 15% dep-waiting packages, we can expect about 2.6% failing. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
