Hi, On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 03:55:49PM +0200, Svante Signell wrote: > On Fri, 2011-04-15 at 01:08 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > > On 15/04/11 00:10, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > Svante Signell, le Thu 14 Apr 2011 23:18:32 +0200, a écrit :
> > And I wouldn't do #ifdef #else #endif, since strdup is portable. > > Just use it unconditionally instead of strcpy. > > I chose not to use it unconditionally, then I would have to rewrite > major parts of this program. It contains very old code, first entry > 1993, latest revision 2004. Since then it seems to have accumulated a > lot of patches, the debian count is 22 (23 with mine). I don't understand. Why would using strdup() unconditionally require more rewrite than using it only for GNU? -antrik- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
