On Thu, 2011-10-06 at 11:44 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Samuel Thibault, le Thu 06 Oct 2011 11:42:05 +0200, a écrit : > > Arne Babenhauserheide, le Thu 06 Oct 2011 08:11:08 +0200, a écrit : > > > Am Dienstag, 4. Oktober 2011, 17:53:49 schrieb Svante Signell: > > > > Even if Samuel creates the build summaries like summary.txt and > > > > graph-total-top.txt there is no priority list on which packages are most > > > > important to concentrate on. Such a list would be very useful for people > > > > working with package porting. > > > > > > I also think that would be very useful. > > > > Sure, but someone has to do it. In the meanwhile, the automatic lists > > graph-total-top.txt and out-of-date.txt are the best we can do. > > Also, remember that there is a list on > http://wiki.debian.org/Debian_GNU/Hurd
Yes, there is a list there and a partial list at: http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/contributing.html In addition to that it would be nice to have a short term list, like: coreutils, binutils, e2fsprogs, etc. that are not the latest versions. Is there some easy way to generate a list of packages sorted in Priority: required, essential, important, optional, etc that currently does not build. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
