On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 23:44:27 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > __vm_statistics@Base 2.11 > > > __vm_wire@Base 2.11 > > > __vm_write@Base 2.11 > > > - __xxx_cpu_control@Base 2.11 > > I guess this is also due to changes? Same answer: dropping symbols in a > lib is something of high importance that symbol lists help to catch.
I'm guessing this and the other similar ones are due to dd48e23f43730038df4bb191e7acc47a4ab73c69 in gnumach. > > Now, the question is whether the RPC user stubs should get Debian symbol > > versioning at all, or if they're simply a best-effort thing? > > Making them a best-effort would mean that some programs using them would > get broken when they are removed. We don't really want that :) Given the above, that would mean we can never remove RPCs from gnumach? That seems a bit tough. regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
