Svante Signell, le Wed 02 Nov 2011 00:51:06 +0100, a écrit : > On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 00:28 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le Wed 02 Nov 2011 00:22:37 +0100, a écrit : > ... > > > Or are you thinking upstream? > > > > Upstream would eventually need a dmesg too. It's however not a simple > > thing to ship, considering the "eat" nature of /dev/klog. > > Does this strange /dev/klog construct have historical reasons for being > there? Never seen similar on other systems.
It's the same on Linux, with /dev/kmsg. Linux just happens to also provide a klogctl interface which provides some backlog. Something like that could also be devised. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
