Svante Signell, le Sun 15 Jan 2012 01:23:02 +0100, a écrit : > On Sat, 2012-01-14 at 23:48 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le Fri 13 Jan 2012 14:43:06 +0100, a écrit : > > > > No, but Guillem probably feels the same, and I do too: it's hard to tell > > > > you anything because you quickly get things personally. > > > > > > I don't consider my replies to be personal > > > > I should have said "you quickly take things personally". It's difficult > > to comment on your code because you quickly take it as a personal > > criticism, which it is not. > > What is personal criticism then, and what is the alternative, > non-personal?
Comments on code is non-personal for sure. > Getting feedback on a proposed patch, isn't that personal? No. > Nobody else is adjusting the patches for you, only commenting on > them. So creating a new patch bounces back to the proposer. Yes, and that's to be expected. It's very rare to see a patch being accepted right away. For instance I have a patch which got a couple bounces back, in like 2 or 3 years timeframe. Yes, that means being patient. > > > And the proposed replacement function works properly, with minor > > > glitches as you points out. > > > > But it doesn't mean that upstream will happily accept it. > > In this case there is no upstream, upstream, maintainer, etc. whoever is in charge. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
