Svante Signell, le Mon 16 Jan 2012 21:32:00 +0100, a écrit : > On Mon, 2012-01-16 at 19:46 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Sebastian Ramacher, le Mon 16 Jan 2012 19:34:58 +0100, a écrit : > > > Is this a known bug with Hurd's /dev/urandom implementation or does it > > > behave differently by design? > > > > It's a known behavior. It's not by design, the random server just > > does not have the loop to fill the buffer. AIUI, that behavior is > > posix-compliant, however. > > Can random-egd generate enough bytes for Hurd? If random-egd can coexist
It can not atm, see the TODO list on the Debian wiki. We should probably rather fix the C random generator, as it poses problem to a few other daemons. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
