Tanguy LE CARROUR, le Fri 03 Feb 2012 11:34:47 +0100, a écrit : > I do agree. Fixing PATH_MAX code should not be the Hurd developer's job! > We could decide to define PATH_MAX in Hurd limits.h or create "#define > PATH_MAX" patches for all the packages for the time being and we would > have 200+ new packages available on Hurd.
With very high probability of having buffer overflow issues. Hiding a bug is never a good solution. > >> Fixing real problems related to Hurd, gnumach, mig, the documentation > >> and Debian or Arch integration and packaging is much more helpful for > >> both Hurd users and the project itself. > > Not everyone can fix "complex" bugs or work on Hurd internals. There are non-complex things to do there too. See the thread about the keymap support on the mach console. Yes, that *is* a non-complex thing to do. Just try. And you'll learn a lot alongside. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
