Ansgar Burchardt, le Fri 20 Apr 2012 14:17:44 +0200, a écrit : > I am not quite sure, but didn't kfreebsd stop relying on debian-ports > when they moved to the main archive?
Possibly, I don't remember. > > If the Debian maintainers were more responsive to bug reports wrt > > GNU/Hurd the debian-ports archive would almost empty by now... > > The problems are not only due to the porters. Currently there are 39 > > bugs with patches, 5 forwarded and 6 pending upload, all with severity > > important in the BTS. > > If maintainers do not react, couldn't you just go for NMUs instead of > uploading changes to debian-ports? I personally never felt sure enough to do an NMU for an arch that is not released yet. But if NMUs are fine for that, then good. > As you plan to stop using debian-ports, can you estimate when this can > be done? That would require estimation of when e.g. pulseaudio will integrate our patches. > A first idea would be to note when you dropped debian-ports > from the buildds and then making sure all binaries uploaded before that > are rebuilt, That is what I intended to do. > but this misses at least arch:all packages. These are only the packages whose sources were uploaded from hurd-i386, right? I believe there aren't many, just the hurdish ones. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
