On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 04:30 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Svante Signell, le Mon 04 Jun 2012 11:14:37 +0200, a écrit : > > Having . in PATH; requires more internal changes, like discussed at > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2012-05/msg00028.html > > Any news on that? > > Again, probing for news will *not* make them magically appear.
Of course not, but when people don't tell anyone what they are working on (or planning to work on), nobody's knowledge increase. > When there are news to give, they are given. When there aren't, well, > they aren't. As announced by your reply to the iconx and execve subject, there was news, good ones. My follow-up question is if bug #654381 on icon is now redundant and be closed, or should it be resubmitted with a removal of the . in PATH part? This affects which changes to make on the web page. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
