Richard Braun, le Thu 29 Aug 2013 12:23:54 +0200, a écrit : > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 12:05:30PM +0200, Justus Winter wrote: > > Quoting Samuel Thibault (2013-08-29 00:24:59) > > > Mmm, I'm not sure whether we really want to introduce > > > proc_set_code/proc_get_code just for killall5. We could just put > > > 0x08000000 / 0x09000000 values for non-essential processes. What do you > > > think? > > > > To be honest, I spent most of the time on that part, thinking that the > > chances of getting this merged without discussion would improve if I > > just implement this instead of providing wrong values to appease > > killall5. Also, providing the correct values aligns our procfs more > > closely with the Linux one, and that is one of the points of our > > procfs, isn't it? > > What's the problem with adding support for valid values ?
I just mean it's more code not necessarily interesting for other use cases. I'm not against it, I'm just wondering how much useful it is. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
