From: Cyril Roelandt <[email protected]> Subject: Re: MAXPATHLEN in ncpfs Date: Sun, 08 Sep 2013 16:10:56 +0200
> On 09/07/2013 05:07 PM, Thomas Danckaert wrote: >> Hello, >> > > Hi! > >> attached patch fixes the MAXPATHLEN build problems for ncpfs. Is this >> the right mailing list for discussion, or should I send this message >> to bug-hurd? (Or directly submit a bug+patch to the Debian bug >> tracking system?) >> > > I think you should file a bug report and send your patch. I will apply your corrections and do that, however, there are some other issues preventing a successful build: - a constant ENOPKG is used. This is apparently a linux-specific error code. In another source file, there is a macro #ifndef ENOPKG #define ENOPKG ENOSYS #endif which solves the issue there, but I don't know whether it is ok to apply this everywhere. - a struct sockaddr_ipx is used, but apparently it is not defined on Hurd. Does this mean the code is highly linux-specific? - a few more occurances of MAXPATHLEN I could correct. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
