On 16/05/14 16:32, Svante Signell wrote: >> If [L_tmpnam] is currently not used, it should probably be dropped to avoid a >> later reintroduction of PATH_MAX. > > OK, we will se what the debian maintainers/upstream says.
Agreed. The updated patch looks good to me now. Thanks, Philipp -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
