Svante Signell, le Tue 21 Oct 2014 17:33:42 +0200, a écrit : > On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 17:16 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Svante Signell, le Tue 21 Oct 2014 17:11:28 +0200, a écrit : > > > On Tue, 2014-10-21 at 15:33 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > > Svante Signell, le Tue 21 Oct 2014 14:04:26 +0200, a écrit : > > > > > openvpn --remote 10.0.2.2 --port 5557 --dev tun --dev-node > > > > > openvpn --remote 10.0.2.2 --port 5556 --dev tun --dev-node > > > > > > > > Err, just realizing: what is 10.0.2.2? If you want to make two instances > > > > of openvpn talk with each other, you have to make them connect to each > > > > other. Or else there is another openvpn daemon running somewhere else > > > > you haven't told us about? > > > > > > I use port forwarding to get access to the kvm images, and 10.0.2.2 is > > > the gateway address. Each kvm instance has the same address 10.0.2.15, > > > with different port numbers. > > > > > > So if I want to copy from one image to another I do e.g. > > > scp -P 5556 10.0.2.2:file . > > > > Ok, that should work indeed. Do you actually see openvpn instances > > connecting to each other in their logs? > > No they don't :(
Then you need to fix that first, using more verbosity, etc. Perhaps 'UDPv4 link local (bound): [undef]' means you should use --local to specify it. Samuel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
