Svante Signell, on Wed 20 Apr 2016 23:40:31 +0200, wrote: > With the naming now you cannot make more than one custom version of > the 1.6 release.
Yes, that's sort of needed, to avoid having to fix d-i for each and every release. > As it is now you cannot make several versions of > e.g. gnumach-1.6+git20160311-1-486 either until a new 1.6+git<date> > version is out. Ok, but that doesn't mean we have to impose the same on custom packages. > And the created package names are awful. I don't see the problem when bash can complete file names. > It would be much better to create custom versions of a given kernel, > like gnumach-1.6.custom<current date> or gnumach-1.6.custom1, > gnumach-1.6.custom2, etc Feel free to propose something which looks good :) Samuel
