On Sun, 2018-09-02 at 15:21 +0200, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > > The statistics and graphs available on the debian-ports page[1] may > > provide some objective statistics or reflection on the actual > > suitability of your architecture's continued inclusion. > > [1]: https://buildd.debian.org/stats/ > > Such statistics are really difficult to get any real conclusion from. > Sometimes 10% packages are missing just for one tricky nonLinux-specific > issue in one package.
Correct: One example is cmake for both hurd-i386 and kfreebsd-any. It does not even have to be tricky. For kfreebsd the patch(es) is attached below!
Index: cmake-3.11.2/bootstrap =================================================================== --- cmake-3.11.2.orig/bootstrap +++ cmake-3.11.2/bootstrap @@ -1352,7 +1352,7 @@ else libs="${libs} -ldl -lrt" ;; *BSD*) - libs="${libs} -lkvm" + libs="${libs} -lkvm -lfreebsd-glue" ;; *SunOS*) # Normally libuv uses '-D_XOPEN_SOURCE=500 -std=c90' on Solaris 5.10,
--- a/debian/control 2018-05-19 10:51:17.000000000 +0200 +++ b/debian_control 2018-07-29 17:38:11.272777000 +0200 @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@ librhash-dev, libuv1-dev (>= 1.10), procps [!hurd-any], + freebsd-glue [kfreebsd-any], python3-sphinx, qtbase5-dev <!stage1>, zlib1g-dev