On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 5:34 PM Samuel Thibault <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > Answering separately since they are completely separate issues. > > Sergey Bugaev, le jeu. 30 sept. 2021 15:35:41 +0300, a ecrit: > > - Filesize:77531148 [weak] > > - > > SHA512:c8108d738ef08afa9556ec395e0b8097e54f66347cce924303b6294dcfa32a4a3853b29597902372562542c7b73ca364be44234d3c0b709e992ad19fa6b566a2 > > - SHA256:06de0c824e0ff3e683a5698ebd63892c34f264eff7d311a7e3a225dd894f8457 > > - SHA1:4b881bd3628a18f0917b55349563fe6a95f25887 [weak] > > - MD5Sum:65d941cde7d7279bbecfe22c67ff40fa [weak] > > Hashes of received file: > > - > > SHA512:9fae8af5d37a72f3410c9c0c70d75c4677b9ee8933bd3a05c8cb20e59430f7b56fb060b6d0cba41a20ac0e7d878cd447a6936b740ffc3536b74afe0fd31d90bb > > - SHA256:06de0c824e0ff3e683a5698ebd63892c34f264eff7d311a7e3a225dd894f8457 > > - SHA1:4b881bd3628a18f0917b55349563fe6a95f25887 [weak] > > - MD5Sum:65d941cde7d7279bbecfe22c67ff40fa [weak] > > - Filesize:77531148 [weak] > > > I'm primarily concerned about the hashsum check failures. In all of the > > cases, filesize, md5, sha1, and sha256 seem to match, but sha512 differs > > between expected and received. I can't really imagine how this could be > > possible unless sha512 was just computed incorrectly either remotely or > > locally. > > That's odd indeed. Which gnumach kernel were you using? I noticed an FPU > context switch bug in gnumach, possibly that was affecting only the > sha512 implementation. It is fixed in version 2:1.8+git20210923-1.
GnuPG released a new version today. The release notes said something about problems with Let's Encrypt. Maybe it affects packaging, too. The changes are not listed in NEWS at the moment, https://dev.gnupg.org/source/gnupg/browse/master/NEWS. But here's the email: https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2021-October/065473.html. Jeff
