Hello, Michael Kelly, le dim. 13 juil. 2025 09:37:33 +0100, a ecrit: > On 21/06/2025 18:18, Samuel Thibault wrote: > > Better validate progressively. > > Here are two further patches to add more NFSv3 functionality. They need to > be applied in sequence 3_3 then 3_4.
Applied, thanks! > Previously the call to chown that was present did not consider the > return value. I have done so but am now wondering if there was a > specific reason to discard that error ? That was probably just a miss, like the rest of the nfsv3 code which is incomplete. That being said, in case of an error, one should probably remove the just-created file, since the operation is supposed to have failed? Samuel
