Stéphane Glondu, le lun. 18 août 2025 08:06:34 +0200, a ecrit: > Le 17/08/2025 à 09:58, Samuel Thibault a écrit : > > > Ah, the patched opensysusers on hurd-amd64 still had a file in /bin. I > > > have uploaded an updated package to unreleased, that should show up with > > > next debian-ports archive run, withint 6h. > > > > Yes, it fixed it. > > [...] > > > > > > libxml-libxml-perl was posing problem notably, I have prioritized it. > > > Again, that should get installed by next debian-ports archive pulse, > > > within 6h. > > > > And that fixed it as well. > > I confirm that I could run a regular debootstrap, with the "brown-tape > modification" of /usr/share/debootstrap/functions. > > Pristine debootstrap still fails with the error about "dpkg [...] --install" > with missing package file. Is that situation transient as well?
It is until the issues with a fix in unreleased get uploaded to unstable. > Or shouldn't a change be submitted to debootstrap so that it is no > longer needed to patch it this way? If somedody gets the time to discuss with debootstrap people, yes. As in: they need to be convinced that it's the right way to put extra-suites before the target suite. Possibly they'd rather want to introduce another option for that case. Samuel
