On Sat Sep 20 20:51:59 1997 +0000
(ÅeÅtadienis, 1997 m. rugsÄjo 20 d. 23:51:59 +0300),
Marco d'Itri wrote:
> This is my draft. Some points are poorly explained, feel free to ask any
> question.
> Please report spelling and grammatical mistakes and so on (anyway, someone
> will probably have to rewrite that).
>
> <START>
> Debian Uniformed Keyboard Mapping Specifications
>
> - UNIFORM DEFINITION OF COMPOSE SEQUENCES
...
> - TOP + numeric keypad keys compose a character (decimal)
> - TOP + numbers and [abcdef] keys compose a character (hexadecimal)
> - left and right shifts are the same key
> - left and right controls are the same key
> - modifiers are:
> - shift (Shift) [any shift, fixed]
> - control (Control) [any control, fixed]
> - meta (Alt) [left alt, fixed]
> - top (AltGr) [right alt] for mode switch or some kbds symbols
> (you can redefine this key to another modifier, but you will lose keypad
> composing.)
Wouldn't it be better to use other keys for
keypad composing ? Then this would be compatable not just with
keymaps for latin scripts.
...
> This document should become an addendum to the policy.
> <END>
>
> --
> ciao,
> Marco
>
>
By,
--
RiÄardas Äepas
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
