I have read this topic at the [EMAIL PROTECTED], in Japanese. I tried to do my best to translate the topic, but I may did something wrong in translation.
I hope someone who knows this more better than me will answer your question. # If he writes the answer in Japanese, on [EMAIL PROTECTED], then # I will try to translate it again. In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, at Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 07:54:09 -0600, on Subject: Re: [debian-devel:11591] locale-*, Ashley Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I read that new libc6-2.1.3 is not compatible to 2.1.2 > > in the format of locale-database, and it may cause the problem > > with locale-ja package. I don't know if locale-ko, locale-vi, > > and locale-zh do have the same problem, but I think it is worth > > to inform the possibility on this list. > > Where did you read this? I would also like to read it as the > maintainer of locale-vi. > > Since the working for improvement of locale handling is done at > > the upstream level on glibc currently, this is preferable than > > to continue to provide the separate locale-* packages. > > Yes, that is preferable, but if I understand correctly that is not a > possibility for -ko, -ja, and -zh due to the way glibc currently > implements locales, I might very well be wrong on this count though. the package of i18ndata has the locale data for ja_JP, zh_CN, and zh_TW in source. But it seems not to have the locale data for ko and vi. So your comment may be valid. Can anyone on the list check this ? -- Taketoshi Sano: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
