Hello all, On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 10:20:50AM +0800, ha shao wrote: > I think Anthony forgot to change GB-H to GB-EUC-H for bold and italic > fonts. The GBK-EUC-H was copied from a fonts.dir put up by the original > abiword cjk patch author. I think he uses Turbolinux Chinese edition which > has GBK Chinese TTF fonts. Yes, I think for debian, it's better to use > GB-EUC-H and B5-H for Simplified and Traditional Chinese respectively.
Actually, I noticed some inconsistencies, but since I know little about Postscript fonts, I left it unchanged. They are left exactly the same as what the CLE is currently using. http://cle.linux.org.tw/ So, I know they are wrong, but I don't know how to correct them either. :-) -- Anthony Fok Tung-Ling Civil and Environmental Engineering [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] University of Alberta, Canada Debian GNU/Linux Chinese Project -- http://www.debian.org/intl/zh/ Come visit Our Lady of Victory Camp -- http://www.olvc.ab.ca/
