>From mquinson Tue Feb 4 08:09:16 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 08:09:16 +0100
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] ident=fetchmail)
by localhost with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18fxCl-00082T-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 04 Feb 2003 08:09:15 +0100
Received: from pop.free.fr [213.228.0.141]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.1.3)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Tue, 04 Feb 2003 08:09:15 +0100
(CET)
Received: (qmail 13933 invoked from network); 3 Feb 2003 17:15:38 -0000
Received: from mx-out.t2.tuxfamily.net (HELO mx1.tuxfamily.net) (80.67.179.7)
by mrelay1-1.free.fr with SMTP; 3 Feb 2003 17:15:38 -0000
Received: from [80.67.174.57] (helo=altern.org)
by mx1.tuxfamily.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #1)
id 18fkBr-0002pg-00
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Mon, 03 Feb 2003 18:15:28 +0100
Received: (qmail 11536 invoked by alias); 3 Feb 2003 17:12:37 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (127.0.0.1)
by localhost with SMTP; 3 Feb 2003 17:12:37 -0000
Date: Mon, 3 Feb 2003 18:12:37 +0100 (CET)
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: re : Re: Asking for a new pseudo package in the BTS: l10n-french
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2003 08:23:35 +0100
Resent-To: [email protected]
Martin wrote:
> I agree that there is still a lot of design issues with that approach (what
> will be the package version when a translation is updated?), but if we could
> get this working, it would be the best.
While we're at it, this type of version increment would be very useful to have
for automatic package rebuilds, when we come to this point (see
http://ydirson.free.fr/en/software/buildinfo.html).
[Martin, could you please bounce this mail to the correct list(s), this [EMAIL
PROTECTED] webmail client does not show me the recipients]
--
Yann.
