On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 01:06:10 +0100 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Denis Barbier) wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2004 at 10:50:11PM +0100, Tim Dijkstra wrote: > [...] > > > Dealing with only one type of comments is certainly much simpler, > > > but then source comments should IMO be displayed. > > > Did you find valuable translators' comments? ;) > > > > IIRC some po-debconf files seem to have some hints to the translator > > in#-comments. Well maybe I remember wrong and they were actually in > > #.-comments. > > You are right, hints at the top are normal comments. They are of > course worth reading, but OTOH never change. > > > > When translating into French we try to follow Christian's Debconf > > > Templates Style Guide > > > http://people.debian.org/~bubulle/dtsg.txt > > > and thus knowing the templates type is important; e.g. > > > descriptions of boolean or string templates do not follow the same > > > rules. > > > > Hmm, okay... > > > > Well either way, it can't be that difficult. I'll have a look at it > > later this week. Well it took 'till today before I had time to look at it, but here are the results: I fixed the po-file parser of poedit to the end that it now knows about autocomments (#.). Upstream already included (in cvs) a panel in the editor frame which shows translator comments. I added a second panel that shows the autocomments. Note that you can switch it off in the 'View' menu. I made a deb including this fix and the spelling checker and put it here: http://www.famdijkstra.org/~tdykstra/debian/poedit/poedit_1.2.5-1.2_i386.deb The version number is 1.2.5 because I didn't want to interfere with the regular debs. It is however a cvs snapshot of today with my patches applied. I also send this upstream, I'm not sure if he'll accept it in this form. So don't get to fond of the new view of you're poedit;) grts Tim
