Hi, I have no problem with the decision. Just had to mention the bidi issue. Now, let hope I'll have enough trafic to justify a -hebrew list (-:
> Quoting Denis Barbier ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > >> This topic can be discussed here on debian-i18n. > > Looks like Denis and I share point of views here..:-) > > For Lior, one argument "against" (or temporarily against) a dedicated > -bidi list is that indeed specific problems of RTL languages probably > need to be quite widely exposed rather than kept in a kind of very > specialised area (another word came to my mind but would have sounded > offensive, I'm afraid, and the last thing I want is hurting people's > feeling). > > I think that all people involved in i18n and l10n must be aware of RTL > specificities just like they have to be aware of the specific issues > of languages such as CJK (Chinese-Japanese-Korean). -i18n needs to > keep this "gathering point" behaviour. > > The use of subject markers can be encouraged for this, of course, such > as "[RTL]" or "[BIDI]" or whatever appropriate. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >
