On Sun, Apr 24, 2005 at 06:03:49PM +0200, Erdal Ronahi wrote: > Hi, > > I have fixed some small bugs and changed the collation chars. I hope the > rest is correct. I cannot read the <U+XXXX> chars, so I don't know > whether the month names and so on are correct.
Hi again, your changes in collation rules are wrong. Lines like collating-symbol <e/>> define a named symbol. It contains only ASCII characters for portability reasons. A circumflex accent is represented by a right angle bracket, which needs to be escaped (by a slash) because symbols appear within angle brackets. The line above defines a symbol which is used in collation rules. Lines like reorder-after <e> <e/>> means that e+circumflex is a letter in your language, and is sorted after e. One could have defined instead collating-symbol <ecirc> or any other name, but using non-ASCII characters is a bad idea. Apart from these symbol renames, you also removed dotless-i (and uppercase dotted i) from collation rules, are these characters not used in your language? Your other changes in LC_NAME contain invalid characters, here is a patch. Denis
--- ku_TR2 2005-04-24 19:04:08.091455464 +0200 +++ ku_TR2 2005-04-24 19:03:46.060804632 +0200 @@ -177,14 +177,14 @@ <U0025><U006D><U0025><U0074><U0025><U0066>" % TODO % Birêz -name_gen "<U0042><U0061><U0072><U0EA><U007A>" +name_gen "<U0042><U0061><U0072><U00EA><U007A>" % "M." -name_mr "<U0042><U0061><U0072><U0EA><U007A>" +name_mr "<U0042><U0061><U0072><U00EA><U007A>" % "Birêz" -name_mrs "<U0042><U0061><U0072><U0EA><U007A>" -name_ms "<<U0042><U0061><U0072><U0EA><U007A>" +name_mrs "<U0042><U0061><U0072><U00EA><U007A>" +name_ms "<U0042><U0061><U0072><U00EA><U007A>" % "Birêz" -name_miss "<U0042><U0061><U0072><U0EA><U007A>" +name_miss "<U0042><U0061><U0072><U00EA><U007A>" END LC_NAME LC_ADDRESS
