On 9/28/05, Jacob Sparre Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jean Christophe AndrÃ(c) wrote: > > Eddy Petrior a écrit : > > > > Either way, there should be a bug against > > > "debian-policy". Is there an interest in this issue at > > > the moment? > > > > Yes!
Which of the variants? Standard or just policy? > > > proposal: /etc/default/environment > > > > My proposal: /etc/default/i18n > > Using "/etc/default/i18n" (or maybe "/etc/default/l10n") > would give us the benefit of keeping locale configuration > data separate, whereas "/etc/default/environment" seems to > be asking for getting a lot of different configuration data > lumped together. Right, I thought about this after I clicked the send button... Probably other separated default environment stuff will emerge as being needed to be separated, so I guess this is a good idea. -- Regards, EddyP ============================================= "Imagination is more important than knowledge" A.Einstein
