On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 10:44:20AM +0100, Erdal Ronahi wrote: > Hi, > > the "ku" locale has been included into glibc recently, as far as I can see > from this: > > http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=870#c2 > > I am not sure, but this should help?
Definitely, but it has been added to CVS trunk and fedora-branch, but not to the glibc 2.3 branch, so it is not part of latest official tarballs and some distributions will miss it. > 2005/11/15, Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: [...] > > I'm more and more thinking about making belocs-locales the default > > locales packages for Debian, but I need supprot for this. As a matter > > of fact, we have something that's way more reactive than locales and > > is thus better for a wider i18n/l10n of Debian. > > > > Denis (CC'ed to get attention), advice? If you can switch to belocs-locales, I see no reason not to do it, but my opinion may be biased ;) Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
