Dimitar Zhekov wrote:
Let's cite more precisely: I mentioned PCW-BG and C++ reference simply because they were on my desk at the moment (C++ ref. still is). My point was that examples of high "k" are pretty easy to find, not that PCW/C++ ref. make the character legitimate. I never said or implied the latter.
I agree that I wasn't precise and I'm sorry for that. I get the "k case" too emotionally and this is the reason for some distortion of facts by me.
Regards, ogi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
