Quoting Clytie Siddall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > Hi guys :) > > In my recent reviews of my D-I files, particularly the Level 1 file, > I've noticed that when original strings have been updated, often the > header has been repeated above the original header. This has > resulted, in several places in the file, in very long string headers. > > I haven't altered anything, because I think these headers have been > inserted with the original string, but they are a nuisance while > navigating the file, and an absolute pain when they get into my > compendium. > > Is it OK to remove all but one of such headers?
Yes. At least for those of example 1 and 2 you gave. The extra "headers" (better say comments, imho) are there because they don't have a dot after the "#" character. This is because someone once used a broken PO file editor, which removes these dots. Then, during the l10n-sync process, the comments are re-added at some moment. So you can remove the comments which begin with "#" without a dot. > # Type: text ^ missing dot > #. Type: text ^ > Example 2. Missing dots as well > > Example 3. (and 4) This is different. Here the extra comments are here because the relevant string appears at different places in D-I packages. This is a result of msgcat several POT files in one. Nothing that I can really change. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
