On Sun, Jun 18, 2006 at 09:01:16AM +0200, Christian Perrier wrote: > > Please have a look at podebconf-report-po(1), you will surely find it > > useful ;) > > Actually, I was about recommedning Mattia to do so but I think that > -i18n notices are also interesting to get *new* translations in. > > I even wonder whether I should make a wishlist BR to po-debconf so > that podebconf-report-po can optionnally send a call for new > translations to a given address (in that case, it would attach the POT > file, of course).
My first reaction is to tell that translators do already have access to POT files by visiting http://www.debian.org/intl/l10n/po-debconf/ But if translators send translations to unresponsive maintainers, their translation can be ignored for months, which is quite discouraging. On the other hand, when a developer send a call for translations, translators do know that their translations will be incorporated in a timely manner. Maybe a good compromise would be to have a list of responsive maintainers, something similar to http://wiki.debian.org/LowThresholdNmu Denis -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
