On Wed, 29 Nov 2006 16:50:19 +0100 Christian Perrier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quoting Wouter Verhelst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2006 at 05:58:52PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote: > > > So, well, the fallback language is a possible option in a few cases > > > such as Northern Sami above....but this is not a definitive solution > > > for most of the currently incomplete languages ? > > > > Why hardcode it? > > Because no-one did yet code another way to do it..:-) > > > > > "While there is a translation of the installer for this language, it is > > not complete. If a part of the interface has not been translated into > > your language, which language would you prefer as a fallback?" > > > Well, this is more or less what has been suggested at the beginning of > this discussion. The tricky point is "how to know that a given > language is or isn't complete", to avoid asking this question for all > installs. That is easy. The same way you know decide to not include certain languages because they are not complete enough. At some point before a release the picture should be clear, right? So yes, this would be a semi-manual task, but that wouldn't be problem, or would it? grts Tim
