On Tuesday 27 March 2007 09:30, Konstantinos Margaritis wrote: > Yes, I agree completely that it was a policy violation, but I disagree > that it was an "ugly hack", in fact it was quite simple and elegant > in how it modified the configurations scripts, and to my knowledge it > never broke a system due to misconfiguration -which is what "ugly > hacks" do most of the time.
My apologies. I did not mean to insult anybody by that.
pgpAjPLHVmimI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
