(Steve Langasek, in answer to the call for updates for postfix)
> > Looks to me like the Smith Review Project should pay more attention to > whether debconf templates should be *removed* from packages instead of being You mean like what I reported in #420413? :-) > updated. All of the above fuzzied and untranslated strings are for > templates that are specific to upgrades from sarge; unless there are plans > for an upload of these debconf updates to proposed-updates, it would be an > unfortunate waste of translator time to update them. The main problem is that I generally have no clue about the maintainer's plan when it comes at the proposal to remove obsolete templates. I even have no clue whether (s)he may want to unmark them for translation. I agree that updating this material is suboptimal. This is why I now unmark such templates for translation when I find them and I recommend dle contributors to skip them when reviewing. This is something that will certainly improve with time in this process. See the upcoming review for net-snmp, for instance. This could be done for postfix of course. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
