"Adam D. Barratt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Perhaps unsurprisingly, debconf itself throws up quite a few false
> positives as debconf-apt-progress makes use of a number of templates
> which are otherwise unused. If desirable, debconf could be exempted from
> the check, as it is from some of the other checks.

I think that's reasonable to do.

-- 
Russ Allbery ([EMAIL PROTECTED])               <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to