On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 05:14:43PM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote: > On 10/07/2008, at 8:48 AM, Nicolas François wrote: > >On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:22:38PM +0930, Clytie Siddall wrote: > Yes, I see what you mean. I thought the Manuals directory might be a > good source for po4a, but currently, only the Release Notes, Reference > Card and Developers' Reference are using po4a. The Debian FAQ is > working towards it. I'd really like to see more of the docs using > po4a, because that would attract more translations, and make it easier > to update the translations we do have.
I told you already in the past that adding PO support for a new language is done in one minute. You don't need to depend on "upstream" support for it as the Release Notes projects demonstrates (only a single Makefile has to be added which contains some po4s specific targets). It's fairly simple (at least it was for Release Notes). So just say: I want to work on ... Please send me the PO file. That should be all. (Of course the package maintainer would need to add a new po4a dependency but I'm sure this would never be a problem. Because of a po4a bug (wrong return value) generated SGML/XML files are currently checked in beside .po as well for DDP documents.) Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
