On 22/08/09 at 11:59 +0200, Luk Claes wrote: > > Of course, at any time of the process, things may be negotiated with > > the maintainer, and adapted to his|her work process...including fully > > abandoning the NMU intent..:-) > > > > This time, I'll look closer at packages I intend to NMU. Probably > > those that are at the top of the list might be poorly maintained > > packages, or even abandoned ones. For the last NMU campaigns, I took > > care of even those packages, but, this time, I might consider asking > > for the package removal if it appears too buggy, useless, outdated, or > > whatever else. > > Not a bad idea. Please do share the ones were you did not get any > maintainer response with the MIA Team even if you proceed with the NMU > so they can look into the specific reasons why the maintainer seems to > be inactive.
Also, if you run into suspicious packages, that might be candidate for orphaning and removal, and don't have time to investigate them yourself, please make a list and send it to [email protected]. -- | Lucas Nussbaum | [email protected] http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: [email protected] GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
