On Wed, Apr 07, 2010 at 05:57:08AM +0200, Christian PERRIER wrote: > Quoting Simon Paillard ([email protected]): > > > pt_BR: used by release-notes, d-i, debian-faq, refcard > > pt-br: used by apt-howto, maint-guide, quick-ref, securing-howto > > > I think that pt_BR should be the winner, nearly without discussion? As > you mentioned, this is the locale name, while "pt-br" is nearly > nothing (used in some packages names, but more because underscore > can't be used there).
I thought so too. But back then, Susan G. Kleinmann and few others recommended to use pt-br style. There were some thread here in [email protected]. Then I made debiandoc-sgml which can accept this pt-br etc. as is. So now, * debiandoc-sgml heritage documents use pt-br * docbook-xml based document uses pt_BR I kind of like FreeBSD style having full locale. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
