On 8 June 2011 21:36, Erik Esterer <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/6/8 Davide Prina <[email protected]>: >> I think that a very simple check can identify this spam typo at nearly 100%: >> if in the translation there is a http link and this http link is not present >> in the English test, than you have spam! And the "Accept with changes" must >> reject the proposed new text version. > > I don't think it's that easy. Sometimes there are language specific > links (English Wikipedia, English Guidelines) and the German team > changes those links to the German equivalent (German Wikipedia, > translated Guidelines...). > Your proposal would disallow making those changes. So the check has to > be more sophisticated (eg. just checking the top-level and > second-level domain).
Well, the simplest solution is to simply forbid changes without an account. In the beginning I worried about forcing that but I think these days it won't bother people as much. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[email protected]> http://svana.org/kleptog/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
