On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 02:55:21PM -0700, David Mosberger wrote: > >>>>> On Fri, 3 May 2002 22:48:08 +0100, Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>>>> said: > > Matthew> -rwxr-xr-x 1 willy Debian 9778176 May 3 15:32 stage1.cc > Matthew> -rwxr-xr-x 1 willy Debian 5274160 May 3 15:32 stage2.cc > > Matthew> An even more impressive 46% reduction in size. I have no > Matthew> idea how typical this is and I haven't attempted to > Matthew> quantify runtime performance yet -- it's still > Matthew> bootstrapping itself. But I thought these results were > Matthew> sufficiently interesting to comment on. > > Isn't this difference due to the stage1 compiler being compiled > without -O2? gcc/ia64 generates horribly inefficient code without at > least -O.
Hmm.. I didn't log the build (doh!) but looking in config.status: [EMAIL PROTECTED]@%-g -O2%g -- Revolutions do not require corporate support. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
