On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 10:41:20AM +1000, Ian Wienand wrote: > On Fri, Apr 02, 2004 at 12:33:26AM +0100, Ian Lynagh wrote: > > I'm having some trouble with ghc6 on ia64 (this is not using the > > packages, which also give SIGILL, but trying to crossport from x86 > > again. > > What versions of things are you using? I just installed both ghc6 and > ghc-cvs packages on an I2, and apart from creating a 8MB executable > file from my simple 10 line example both work fine. > > libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone > data > ghc-cvs 20031220-3 GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilation system > ghc6 6.2-3 GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilation system > gcc 3.3.3-2 The GNU C compiler > Hmm, the same ones as you, of those you list. ghc6 should have beaten ghc-cvs to /usr/bin/ghc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -l libc6.1 ghc-cvs ghc6 gcc [...] ii libc6.1 2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone pn ghc-cvs <none> (no description available) ii ghc6 6.2-3 GHC - the Glasgow Haskell Compilation system ii gcc 3.3.3-2 The GNU C compiler [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ghc Illegal instruction [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ ghc6 Illegal instruction [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ which ghc /usr/bin/ghc [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dpkg -S usr/bin/ghc ghc6: /usr/bin/ghc6 ghc6: /usr/bin/ghci6 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ I've put the complete dpkg -l output at http://merulo.debian.org/~igloo/dpkg-l > (might want to leave glibc list off, they have enough to worry about > until we can prove it's a glibc bug) Rightyho. Thanks Ian
