Hi,
Would you like to know the end of the story? Here is it:
http://lists.trolltech.com/qt4-preview-feedback/2008-01/thread00033-0.html
Sorry for the noise, this wasn't an ia64-, nor a Debian-specific problem.
Best regards,
Émeric
2008/8/10 Émeric Maschino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi,
>
> The saga continues.
>
> Today, I've updated my Fedora 9 "Sulphur" installation to Fedora Rawhide
> (development version) in order to close the gap with Debian Lenny.
>
> My program is now also crashing with Fedora Rawhide due to the incorrect
> behaviour of atof!
>
> So many packages have been updated that I cannot determine which one is the
> culprit. I've nevertheless tried to downgrade to the glibc, libstc++ and gcc
> packages provided by Fedora 9 "Sulphur", but it didn't help.
>
> To summarize, the problem isn't limited to Debian and I don't know if it
> can be reproduced on a non-ia64 system.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Émeric
>
>
> 2008/8/10 Émeric Maschino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Today, I ran on the Fedora installation the binary produced with the
>> Debian installation. Guess what? Yes, it worked like a charm!
>>
>> Now the strange thing. I ran on the Debian installation the binary
>> produced with the Fedora installation. Segfaults due to the atof returning 0
>> rather than 0.189.
>>
>> So, the problem isn't at compile time, but at runtime, and only on the
>> Debian installation. I'm still wondering what's going wrong, since a simple
>> C++ program with a single call to atof runs flawlessly on my Debian
>> installation.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Émeric
>>
>>
>> 2008/8/9 Émeric Maschino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Today, I recompiled the whole project on my Fedora installation using the
>>> updated gcc 4.3.1-4 packages from Rawhide. No problem with gcc 4.3.1 on my
>>> Fedora installation.
>>>
>>> By contrast, despite a complete recompile with gcc 4.3.1 on my Debian
>>> Lenny installation, atof and strtof still behave incorrectly!
>>>
>>> Is there any significant patch applied by Debian on the gcc 4.3.1
>>> upstream code (or any related package) that could explain this situation?
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Émeric
>>>
>>>
>>> 2008/8/8 Émeric Maschino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have free time to play Fedora 9 "Sulphur" on my hp workstation zx6000.
>>>> The exact same C++ project (since the source code is on a separate
>>>> partition) runs as expected on Fedora.
>>>> gcc version is 4.3.0 20080428.
>>>> My Debian Lenny installation comes with gcc 4.3.1.
>>>> Has something changed between gcc 4.3.0 and 4.3.1 regarding the standard
>>>> C/C++ header inclusion?
>>>>
>>>> I'm really running out of ideas...
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>>
>>>> Émeric
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
