On 6/16/19 12:56 AM, Jim Wilson wrote: > On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 7:30 AM Jason Duerstock > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Regarding LRA, I saw this coming and started working on it here: >> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90785 >> Judging from the similar SH4 PR, I understand this isn't a trivial thing to >> fix. > > Yes, which is why some folks would rather get rid of the IA-64 port > than try to fix it themselves.
Regarding LRA, I can only speak for SH where LRA mostly works fine although it has some issues here and there. >> Is there any reason I couldn't become the ia64 maintainer, assuming there >> was someone available to act as my general gcc mentor? > > Yes, I suppose that I can act as a mentor. I'm extremely busy with > RISC-V stuff though, so I may not have much time to help. I wonder what's left for RISC-V to do. Most of the stuff seems to work, the only thing that no one has taken care of are OpenJDK and LLVM. I would have taken care of the OpenJDK stuff, at least for the Zero VM, but I feel that RISC-V has an insane amount of people working on the ports, so I rather focus on my pet ports ;). Adrian -- .''`. John Paul Adrian Glaubitz : :' : Debian Developer - [email protected] `. `' Freie Universitaet Berlin - [email protected] `- GPG: 62FF 8A75 84E0 2956 9546 0006 7426 3B37 F5B5 F913
