Hi Frank, Thanks for the report.
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 3:55 AM Frank Scheiner <frank.schei...@web.de> wrote: > > Dear all, > > there is a boot regression in effect in Linux v6.4-rc3 that affects at > least: > > * rx2620 (w/2 x Montecito and zx1) > * rx2800-i2 (w/1 x Tukwila) > > ...(see second part of [1] and following posts for more details, [2] and > [3] for the respective logs), example here: > > ``` > ELILO v3.16 for EFI/IA-64 > .. > Uncompressing Linux... done > Loading file AC100221.initrd.img...done > [ 0.000000] Linux version 6.4.0-rc3 (root@x4270) (ia64-linux-gcc > (GCC) 12.2.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.39) #1 SMP Thu May 25 15:52:20 > CEST 2023 > [ 0.000000] efi: EFI v1.1 by HP > [ 0.000000] efi: SALsystab=0x3ee7a000 ACPI 2.0=0x3fe2a000 > ESI=0x3ee7b000 SMBIOS=0x3ee7c000 HCDP=0x3fe28000 > [ 0.000000] PCDP: v3 at 0x3fe28000 > [ 0.000000] earlycon: uart8250 at MMIO 0x00000000f4050000 (options > '9600n8') > [ 0.000000] printk: bootconsole [uart8250] enabled > [ 0.000000] ACPI: Early table checksum verification disabled > [ 0.000000] ACPI: RSDP 0x000000003FE2A000 000028 (v02 HP ) > [ 0.000000] ACPI: XSDT 0x000000003FE2A02C 0000CC (v01 HP rx2620 > 00000000 HP 00000000) > [...] > [ 3.793350] Run /init as init process > Loading, please wait... > Starting systemd-udevd version 252.6-1 > [ 3.951100] ------------[ cut here ]------------ > [ 3.951100] WARNING: CPU: 6 PID: 140 at kernel/module/main.c:1547 > __layout_sections+0x370/0x3c0 > [ 3.949512] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address > 1000000000000000 > [ 3.951100] Modules linked in: > [ 3.951100] CPU: 6 PID: 140 Comm: (udev-worker) Not tainted 6.4.0-rc3 #1 > [ 3.956161] (udev-worker)[142]: Oops 11003706212352 [1] > [ 3.951774] Hardware name: hp server rx2620 , BIOS > 04.29 > 11/30/2007 > [ 3.951774] > [ 3.951774] Call Trace: > [ 3.958339] Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address > 1000000000000000 > [ 3.956161] Modules linked in: > [ 3.951774] [<a0000001000156d0>] show_stack.part.0+0x30/0x60 > [ 3.951774] sp=e000000183a67b20 > bsp=e000000183a61628 > [ 3.956161] > [ 3.956161] > ``` > > [1]: https://lists.debian.org/debian-ia64/2023/05/msg00010.html > > [2]: https://pastebin.com/SAUKbG7Z > > [3]: https://pastebin.com/v1TTB2x3 It seems the error happened during the WARN_ON_ONCE. Could you please try whether something like the following fixes it? diff --git i/kernel/module/main.c w/kernel/module/main.c index 0f9183f1ca9f..ae42dfc1a815 100644 --- i/kernel/module/main.c +++ w/kernel/module/main.c @@ -1537,7 +1537,7 @@ static void __layout_sections(struct module *mod, struct load_info *info, bool i || is_init != module_init_layout_section(sname)) continue; - if (WARN_ON_ONCE(type == MOD_INVALID)) + if (type == MOD_INVALID) continue; s->sh_entsize = module_get_offset_and_type(mod, type, s, i); If that doesn't work, maybe we need something like this: diff --git i/arch/ia64/kernel/module.c w/arch/ia64/kernel/module.c index 3661135da9d9..4e9a7f0498e2 100644 --- i/arch/ia64/kernel/module.c +++ w/arch/ia64/kernel/module.c @@ -815,7 +815,7 @@ apply_relocate_add (Elf64_Shdr *sechdrs, const char *strtab, unsigned int symind uint64_t gp; struct module_memory *mod_mem; - mod_mem = &mod->mem[MOD_DATA]; + mod_mem = &mod->mem[MOD_TEXT]; if (mod_mem->size > MAX_LTOFF) /* * This takes advantage of fact that SHF_ARCH_SMALL gets allocated Song
