In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Thu, 2 Dec 1999 00:42:26 +0800), "James 
Bromberger \(CWIS Officer\)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:

> Can anyone please tell me why should be so different with the IPv4 Named 
> Virtual Hosting here? I assume others have got NVH and IPv6 working...

Hmm, I don't think that it's Debian specific issue.
Could you show me your log and other proper information
(i.e. REMOTE_ADDR etc.)?

I think that comparison of IPv4 mapped address does not worked correctly
(at least, as we expected).  I should work on it...


Recently, new project named 'Linux IPv6 Application Porting Project' 
has been started. It's set up for making distribution-independent 
IPv6 application porting to Linux systems.  Why don'y you join us?

See: http://www.v6.linux.or.jp/
     http://chiharu.v6.linux.or.jp/%7Eyoshfuji/ports-devel/

-- 
Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Web Page: http://www.ecei.tohoku.ac.jp/%7Eyoshfuji/
PGP5i FP: F731 6599 5EB2 BBA7 1515  1323 1806 A96F 5700 6B25 

Reply via email to